Cricket Australia angry at Khawaja decision, asks ICC to explain

Australia’s Usman Khawaja (R) visibly disappointed after being given out on the first day of the third Ashes Test.

Cricket Australia has demanded an explanation from the ICC as to why Usman Khawaja‘s dismissal was not overturned after a decision review, which showed no evidence that Khawaja edged Graeme Swann’s delivery.

Khawaja was justifiably annoyed by the third umpire’s decision, shaking his head when umpire Kumar Dharmasena decided to back Tony Hill’s on-field call of out. There was no mark on Hot Spot and replays suggested, while not entirely conclusive, that the ball had not touched Khawaja’s bat.

An angry Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland, in a press release, said: “Cricket Australia has sought an explanation from the ICC on the dismissal of Usman Khawaja, in our view, the on-field decision and referred decision using DRS were both incorrect. CA remains a strong supporter of DRS and believes it is important that cricket continues to improve and build confidence in the DRS.

“We understand and accept that from time to time mistakes can be made, however in this instance, on behalf of the player, the team and all cricket fans, we feel duty bound to seek further explanation as to how this decision was arrived at.”

Meanwhile, Chris Rogers, who was at the non-striker’s end, was mystified with events which were unfolding. Here is what he said of the events: “He (Khawaja) said he didn’t hit it and I said he didn’t hit it. That was about it, I was up the other end. Even in real time I didn’t think he hit it; I didn’t think he was anywhere near it.

“The umpire must have had a different view on it. I thought it was not out and that’s why we reviewed it. From what we saw on the replays I think even the England guys had given up hope of it being out. It was disappointing and another question-mark.

“It’s a weird thing because it’s people’s careers on the line as well, so you want these decisions to be right. I felt for him, but it’s been happening so we’ve just got to get on with it and not worry about that and try to have a good day.”

Rogers, however, believes that there is still a place for technology in assisting umpires: “I still think it’s important,” he added.

“We want technology to make sure these decisions are correct. Sometimes it goes for you and sometimes it goes against you. You just have to take it.”