Arsenal vs. West Brom: An undeserved win (on penalties) but who cares?

Arsenal players celebrate victory in the penalty shoot-out against West Bromwich Albion at The Hawthorns on September 25, 2013 in West Bromwich, England. (Getty Images)

It wasn’t pretty, but we managed to pull off the win, and that’s really all that counts. I do regret that West Brom came so close only to come away with nothing, for the League Cup offers clubs the rare opportunity to do something famous.

It’s similar to the movie Hoosiers, in which any club, no matter how small, has a chance to knock any club, no matter how large. We saw a dose of this last spring when Wigan knocked Manchester City off to claim the FA Cup.

For the first sixty minutes and again for most of the rest of regulation and into overtime, West Brom simply outplayed Arsenal and arguably deserved the win more than we. That we came out with a win anyway proves only that outcome and effort are sometimes miles apart, for we were certainly not the better squad on the evening.

That said, there are few moral victories in sport, and so I doubt that there are many Baggies trudging home thinking, “well, at least we hung tough”. To those who are, it’s cold consolation, if any at all. I’ve been on the other side of such losses, and I’d almost prefer to have been roundly thrashed.

Once Serge Gnabry missed his spot-kick, I thought, “well, that’s it.” I can’t imagine (and don’t want to, either) what it must have felt like to be on the other end, thinking, “we’re going to pull this off” only to see not one but two misses slam shut the door.

To have come so close only to see victory slip through their fingers must be agonizing, and I hope it doesn’t provide West Brom with too much motivation against us going forward.

Back to Arsenal. Back to Gnabry. For as much as we might bemoan the saved kick, let’s be honest. Penalties are a lottery. The shooter picks one of three basic options: left, centre, right. The keeper chooses from the same. Even if the keeper matches the shooter, there’s placement, pace, timing.

On the whole, Gnabry’s shot was among the better-taken of the ten. He just had the bad luck of being the only one whose shot was saved. Here, then, is a quick review:

Steven Reid: 8/10 – well-taken, top-right corner and out of reach despite Lukasz Fabia?ski guessing right.
Nicklas Bendtner: 6/10 – decent but only midway between the centre of goal and the right post. Good thing Luke Daniels guessed wrong.
Markus Rosenberg: 4/10 – very nearly down the middle, almost saved by Fabia?ski, who dove to his left but almost deflected anyway.
Gnabry: 5/10 – similar to Bendtner’s but towards the left post. Daniels guessed correctly and parried.
James Morrison: 9/10 – nearly perfect, top-left corner shot. The only element missing would be to have it glance in off the post.
Kris Olsson: 6/10 – good shot, beating Daniels who guessed right. Extra point given for responding well to the pressure of the moment.
Craig Dawson: 1/10 – plain and simple, you must make the keeper save, at a minimum. Putting it that far wide is inexcusable, especially given how a goal would have all but sealed the victory.
Chuba Akpom: 5/10 – again, another decent shot but only midway between the centre and the post, benefitting more from the keeper guessing wrong than from the quality of the shot.
Morgan Amalfitano: 1/10 – as with Dawson, one must put it on-frame. Knowing that the squads were now level, it was all the more crucial to do so.
Nacho Monreal: 6/10 – the shot was midway between centre and post and went in because the keeper guessed wrong.

That was enough to seal it. It may not be fair or just, but we advance and will host Chelsea in the next round, set for October 29 or 30. West Brom will nurse its wounds while we savour the win. I’d like to offer up a platitude along the lines of “that’s the way the ball bounces”, but it might be more-true to point out that we escaped by the skin of our teeth. On to a few other individual performances, then.