What is the UFC rule about grounded opponent? Is it going to change? Laura Sanko sheds light on the matter
MMA thrives on a delicate balance between ferocious competition and fighter safety. This balance is heavily influenced by a complex set of rules that govern everything from grappling techniques to legal strikes.
While some rules are consistently enforced, others remain open to interpretation and potential changes. One such area of ongoing debate is the 'grounded fighter' rule, specifically regarding landing knees to the head of a downed opponent.
What is the UFC rule about grounded opponents?
The current UFC rule defines a grounded fighter as anyone with any part of their body (excluding feet) touching the canvas. Under this definition, a fighter can avoid strikes to the head by simply placing one hand down.
However, the legality of knees becomes murky when a fighter has only one hand down and both feet on the mat. This scenario has resulted in several controversial stoppages due to potentially illegal knees.
Is the UFC rule about grounded opponents going to change?
The answer appears to be yes. According to recent reports, the Association of Boxing Commissions and Combat Sports (ABC) will vote on potentially revising the 'grounded fighter' rule on July 24.
Additionally, during the UFC Vegas 94 event, UFC commentator Laura Sanko revealed in a significant update that a fighter will no longer be considered downed if only their hands are touching the canvas. To be considered grounded, a fighter must have another body part (knee, shin, or buttocks) touching the canvas in addition to their hands.
This effectively removes the 'hands-down' loophole for grounded fighters. The revised rule is expected to come into effect from Oct. 1.
Check out Laura Sanko's comment below:
The proposed changes could significantly impact the dynamic of grappling exchanges. Fighters may be less likely to rest a single hand down, fearing a legal knee to the head. This could lead to more active grappling and potentially faster finishes.