5 Superstars who should have won the Royal Rumble instead of Roman Reigns

WWE trended worldwide after Royal Rumble for all the wrong reasons. When the fans saw the Triple threat match between Brock Lesnar, Seth Rollins and John Cena, they expected the pay-per-view to go home in the same intensity but thanks to some bad booking, it ended flat on the ground.Roman Reigns winning the Rumble was the biggest complaint about the pay-per-view and looking at the bigger picture, WWE did have a lot of alternatives to the Samoan Superman.The Reigns win cannot be reversed now but here is a look at some ‘What should have been’ situations that the company wasted last night in the Land of Extreme when the produced Royal Rumble. 

#5 Undertaker

Undertaker did not appear at the Rumble but he is almost sure to wrestle at WrestleMania against Bray Wyatt. So if the company was going to drag him back into the ring in a matter of months, why couldn’t they let him win the Rumble and have a rematch with Lesnar?

If the company was worried about the fragile state of Bryan when it came to letting him win, they could have easily gone with Taker as the last entrant. No one would have booed Taker if he eliminated Bryan because it is hard to hate the Phenom.

Taker facing Lesnar at Mania would have made it an unpredictable match since both men would find it hard to stay for a longer period after the pay-per-view.