US Open 2013: Heroic Serena Williams enters folklore with win over Victoria Azarenka
For a champion so widely renowned for her unshakeable temperament, Serena Williams sure indulges in a fair share of demented screaming during her matches. The frequent bouts of energy release do add to the ferocious, intimidating image that she presents to her opponents, but they also make you question how her game can remain consistent through these emotional peaks and valleys. How can a player want something so bad that her head seems in danger of exploding, and yet keep her hand so steady that her shots repeatedly find the lines?
Even after her 7-5, 6-7, 6-1 victory over Victoria Azarenka in yesterday’s US Open final, which gave her her fifth US Open crown and 17th Slam title overall, it’s difficult to fathom exactly how Williams manages to keep coming through despite her obviously turbulent inner self. Or maybe it’s not difficult to fathom, but only difficult to explain. Because when you think about all the mythical tales of heroes and their gladiatorial battles, you realize that it’s always the most passionate, overtly intense fighters who end up triumphing. They all seem to want it too bad, but that’s just what helps them find their target consistently enough, and what gets them over the line in the end.
It might seem a little incongruous to call Serena Williams’s game ‘consistent’, but I’d like to see anyone else take as big cuts at the ball as she does and still find the court with anything resembling regularity. Admittedly, her forehand – which she insists on hitting as hard as possible even if she is completely out of position – does occasionally expose the pitfalls of her attack-at-all-costs mindset. Midway through the second set yesterday, Williams could barely get her crosscourt forehand to reach the top half of the net, and it wasn’t difficult to see why – she kept refusing to add extra spin to counter Azarenka’s penetrating crosscourt strikes, and kept paying the price.
But Williams’s forehand is perhaps the only part of her game to which the conventional rules of geometry and probability apply. Her backhand, a shot that, like her serve, will probably go down as one of the most devastatingly effective shots in tennis history, is above all such base theories. Williams hits her backhand as flat as a whistle, and as hard as a bullet, and yet finds a way to make it consistent. She used that shot, even more so than her serve, to hurt Azarenka yesterday, and she did it all with an air of nonchalance that suggested she could have done it even with her eyes closed. Whether abruptly ending a rally by conjuring a crosscourt winner out of nowhere, opening up the court by swiping a short-angle strike that stretched Azarenka far beyond the tramlines, or unleashing a down-the-line blast that left the Belarussian flat-footed, Williams used her backhand to overcome all of her doubts and big-stage jitters.
Of course, a big part of the reason why Williams had to overcome any kind of jitters at all was Azarenka’s stellar play when backed against the wall. The Belarussian seemed to get better as the situation got bleaker, and if it were not for her relative inability to consistently create her own pace, we may have been looking at a different result.
The Belarussian seemed more in control of the first set than Williams and handled the windy conditions in the early going with more composure than her opponent, but there was always the lingering feeling that she would get blown off the court the moment Williams found her range. And that’s exactly what happened towards the end of the first set and through the first half of the second, as Williams rained down big serves and groundstrokes to push Azarenka on to her heels.
But it’s not for nothing that so many people expected this match to be close. Azarenka’s uncanny sense of anticipation, her formidable returning skills and her underrated ‘feel’ for the ball enable her to get even the hardest hit shots back in play. It’s doubtful whether any player that Williams has faced in her career has had as much success returning serve as Azarenka has in the last few matches that the two have played. When serving for the match, first at 5-4 and then again at 6-5, Williams actually did come up with some really big serves, which normally is a surefire recipe to win her a free point, or least put her on the ascendancy in the point. But Azarenka kept putting those lasers back in play; the harder Williams served, the easier Azarenka seemed to read the delivery, and the quicker she managed to put the ball at the American’s feet.
By the time the second set reached the tiebreaker, the match seemed deadlocked. With every step towards defeat that Azarenka took, her intensity seemed to increase exponentially, to the point that she started matching Williams not just stare-for-stare and scream-for-scream, but also shot-for-shot (which is physically impossible for about 99.99% of the women’s tour to do).