10 WrestleMania matches that shouldn't have ended how they did
That's the question that fans sometimes have to ask themselves after a controversial outcome in a match and while The WWE has been known to make the right decision from time to time, there are other instances where they don't. Unfortunately for The WWE Universe, a lot of these poor decisions come at WrestleMania have come at WrestleMania.
With that being said, there are obviously some WrestleMania matches that fans would probably want a do-over on and for good reason. Sure, going back and fixing these mistakes is impossible, but wouldn't it be great if WWE didn't make these ten booking mistakes at WrestleMania?
#10 Dean Ambrose vs Brock Lesnar: WrestleMania 32
It is no secret that Dean Ambrose is sometimes treated as the redheaded stepchild of The Shield and while Ambrose has had his time in the Championship picture over the years, he has yet to have the kind of crowning WrestleMania moment that his Shield brethren have had in their short time in singles competition.
It looked like WWE was ready to remedy that with a match between Brock Lesnar and Dean Ambrose at WrestleMania 32, especially since a win for Ambrose would mean he was the first superstar to beat Lesnar after he beat the streak at WrestleMania 30, but WWE decided to give Lesnar the win instead.
Sure, WWE made Ambrose look semi-tough in defeat during the match, even making Lesnar hit Ambrose with multiple F-5's to finish him off, but it still was a huge letdown for fans hoping to see Ambrose finally have his moment. Not only that, the match did next to nothing for Ambrose moving forward either.
Then again, it's not exactly fair to label this match as a complete failure. In fact, Ambrose lasting as long as he did in the match was one of the factors used to build him up as WWE Champion later that year, but a win over Lesnar probably would have been a much better way to do that too.