3 Reasons why WWE should hold on to Brock Lesnar and 2 reasons why they should not
Brock Lesnar's status with WWE since the past few years has been the subject of many debates. While some feel that the Beast Incarnate is a mainstream attraction and one of the biggest draws, many people are tired of the special treatment that he receives. However, with Wrestlemania 35 just a few months around the corner, the discussions on Lesnar's future have surfaced again.
While letting go of a part-timer like Lesnar will help in giving more spotlight to other credible wrestlers, there are certain perks that only Brock Lesnar can bring to the table. Here we look at 3 reasons why WWE should hold on to Brock Lesnar and 2 reasons why they shouldn't.
#3 Why they should: Brock Lesnar can put over many wrestlers
Brock Lesnar has one of the strongest résumés in professional wrestling. For a wrestler who has been on the main roster for only 8 years, Lesnar has achieved more than many of WWE's most elite Hall of Famers. With his defeats to John Cena at 2012 Extreme Rules and Triple H at Wrestlemania 29, it is evident that Lesnar does not have much of a problem in taking a loss.
Brock Lesnar's credibility can be used in pushing over many wrestlers. In his matches against AJ Styles, Daniel Bryan, and Finn Balor, the Beast has shown that he can make anyone look good regardless of his size. Even if he puts over Seth Rollins cleanly at Wrestlemania 35, the brand that Brock Lesnar is won't be hurt too much by that loss.
Having him put over another star at an event like Summerslam could do wonders for his career. Who knows, we might see the Demon King slay the Beast some day in the future to avenge his loss.