hero-image

5 Reasons Dean Ambrose leaving WWE might be a work, and 5 why his departure could be legitimate

Is the WWE saying 'goodbye Dean' for real or are they just trying to entertain us?
Is the WWE saying 'goodbye Dean' for real or are they just trying to entertain us?

Should he stay or should he go? Is this real-life drama playing out in the WWE or an elaborate concocted angle?

When it comes to pro wrestling, it's impossible to not have an opinion about the man known as the Lunatic Fringe, Dean Ambrose.

Overwhelmingly, that opinion seems to be a positive one. Fans like Ambrose's edgy, anti-hero character and see him as a somewhat less bombastic and sneakier version of Stone Cold Steve Austin. In terms of wrestling ability, Ambrose is smooth as silk and rarely makes mistakes, and is known for his unpredictable offence and ring generalship.

In fact, when most people have something negative to say regarding Ambrose, it's usually about the way his character is portrayed and his lack of main event status rather than any fault of the Lunatic Fringe.

And here's an interesting caveat; Ambrose is very popular with women in the audience. Much like the Rock N Roll Express in the 1980s, Dean Ambrose can appeal to all segments of the audience, the women, men, and children.

Recently, it was reported that Dean Ambrose had told the WWE he would not be re-signing with the company. Given the well-known dissatisfaction that has led to other talent such as the Revival wanting out of their contracts, fans were ready to believe this was a legitimate news story.

But hold the phones; The WWE made no public statement whatsoever about the Revival. Dean Ambrose's departure, however, has been publicly acknowledged by the company. Instantly the rumours started flying; Is Dean Ambrose's request for release for real, or just a storyline?

Here are five reasons it might be a work or fabricated story, and five it might just be for real.


Could be a work #1: The WWE usually does not comment publicly about contractual matters

Dean Ambrose and Vince McMahon in more civil days.
Dean Ambrose and Vince McMahon in more civil days.

Here is a well known fact; the WWE does not make a policy out of speaking publicly about the contractual status of its talent, except in special circumstances.

Brock Lesnar and Ronda Rousey are good examples of the exception to the rule. Their mainstream media appeal and rock star-esque status make their contracts big business. Another time the WWE will speak about talent and their status is when such talent has been released.

These are the announcements that usually involve the phrase 'wishing them nothing but the best in their future endeavours.' Thus, being 'future endeavoured' has become a euphemism for being fired from the WWE.

But for the WWE to make a public announcement about a star leaving, and still feature that star on their programming? It's literally unheard of. This is a strong sign that the whole drama might in fact be a work.

You may also like