5 things from the Undertaker vs Shane McMahon match that could have been better

 

Shane O Mac vs Undertaker had few flaws

Wrestlemania 32 has now come and gone, along with one of its most anticipated matches, Shane McMahon vs The Undertaker. Overall the hell in cell bout was an intense, epic encounter, but today will be nitpicking and exploring the negatives. So let's take a look now at five things that weren't quite right with the Undertaker vs Shane o Mac match/feud. 

Also read: [Video] WWE Raw Results, 25 April, 2016, Full Show with Video Highlights

5. Position on the card

Taker and Shane should have closed the show

Let's start of with one of the biggest problems with the Shane v Taker match, which was its position on the Wrestlemania card. Discussions arose during the weeks leading into mania, as fans surmised which match would actually end up closing the show. The potential for HHH v Reigns to flop seemed too great, along with the Undertakers career being on the line against the future of the WWE, the hell in a cell match seemed more important and many assumed it would main event.

Unfortunately WWE went the standard route, having the world championship bout close the show, which in hindsight, was an even worse decision and Shane v Taker was clearly the superior match. Furthermore, had this match closed the show, fans would have bought into the idea more that Undertaker could actually lose and officially retire.