5 reasons why WWE should fire Brock Lesnar
WWE have made a lot of mistakes over the course of their existence and while the exact number will forever climb into the heavens, one of their biggest ones had to be the fact that they signed Lesnar to a new contract the week before WrestleMania 34. In fact, one has to wonder why they would bother when they really don't need him anymore?
Not only did the move seem perplexing when you consider the plethora of other talents that WWE could turn into the face of the company if they really wanted to, but also due to the fact that keeping the title on Lesnar at WrestleMania 34 was a very anti-climatic ending to have at The Grandest Stage Of Them All.
With all that being said and Lesnar now signed to another contract with the WWE until they can make Roman Reigns into the guy, here are five reasons why WWE don't actually need Brock Lesnar anymore.
As always, let us know what you think in the comments below and tell us if you think WWE need Brock Lesnar or not.
#5 stacked women's division
The Women's Revolution is still taking the world by storm and while WWE has yet to hold an all women main event at WrestleMania, they are arguably one of the most watched aspects of weekly WWE television. Not only that, they have some of the best matches night after night, which has only propelled the movement further.
With that being said and the WWE Universe more focused on women's wrestling than ever before, why does the company even need someone like Brock Lesnar anymore? Maybe that wasn't the case a couple of years ago when women's wrestling was still considered the excuse to take a bathroom break, but it is far from that now.
In fact, WWE has a multitude of top-level women including Asuka, Charlotte, Ronda Rousey, Sasha Banks and Nia Jax, that could propel WWE into the mainstream conciseness. Unfortunately for WWE, they still have it in their minds that they need Brock Lesnar when they have an absolutely stacked women's division they can focus on instead.