"Guy hasn't aged in 20 years" - WWE Universe reacts to Stone Cold Steve Austin’s stunning physique at 57-years-old
Stone Cold Steve Austin recently posted a video addressing his recent training videos and potential comeback rumors.
Recently, Austin has been posting videos of himself training vigorously. The videos came as a shock to many fans considering he has retired from the ring.
The videos also sparked rumors that perhaps the Rattlesnake is training for an in-ring return. Given that WrestleMania 39 is only a few months away, the rumors have started gaining momentum.
However, Steve Austin recently posted a video to Instagram where he addressed his recent training videos as well as rumors of a potential comeback. In the video, Steve Austin said that the reason he has been training so hard is because he looked in the mirror and realized didn't really like what he saw.
The WWE Universe reacted positively to Steve Austin's incredible workout routine and physique at 57 years old. Check out some of their reactions below:
One fan said that Austin was and always will be the man.
Another fan believed that the former WWE Champion was lying to the fans.
While another fan said that Stone Cold Steve Austin looked good for his age.
Some fans don't seem to believe Steve Austin.
What ever the reason may be, Austin is looking in ring-ready shape and shouldn't be counted out for an approach at the Show of Shows.
Stone Cold Steve Austin made his in-ring return at WrestleMania 38
Steve Austin shocked the world when he made his in-ring return at WrestleMania 38 to face Kevin Owens in a No Holds Barred match.
Although Austin occasionally appeared on WWE television since his retirement, this was his first official match. The match wasn't too bad and the Rattlesnake was able to put Owens away in 13 minutes.
This match is what started the initial speculation that Stone Cold would be back to compete at this year's WrestleMania as well. Only time will tell if Austin will make a comeback this year as well.
Do you think Austin is training for an in-ring return? Let us know in the comments section below.