5 things WWE should have done differently at Survivor Series
Survivor Series has been received fairly well by the WWE Universe, with a lot of surprises, some great action, and entertaining storylines. We saw Brock Lesnar and Daniel Bryan put up a great show in the finale, while we saw an interesting heel turn by Charlotte Flair, who faced Ronda Rousey but lost by DQ, in a match that showcased both Superstars' phenomenal talents.
Also Read: 5 possible fallouts from Survivor Series
But there have been a few things that the WWE Universe weren't impressed about or what WWE could have differently/better to make storylines or the show much more interesting and a better spectacle.
Here are 5 things WWE should have done differently at Survivor Series
#1 No surprise 5th pick for SmackDown Women's team
The women's elimination match was to feature five Superstars from RAW and five from SmackDown, but the final Superstar of SmackDown wasn't announced till Survivor Series day.
Charlotte was supposed to be the fifth member of Team SmackDown, but following Becky Lynch's injury which resulted in her being removed from her match with Ronda Rousey, Charlotte was added to the singles match and there was one final member to be added to Team SmackDown.
Prior to the match, there were more changes as Ruby Riott and Natalya were removed from Team RAW, and replaced with Sasha Banks and Bayley. The fifth member of SmackDown was Mandy Rose, which was not much of a surprise and what was expected from WWE.
The WWE could have added a curveball and brought in a new Superstar, someone like Shayna Baszler, to fill in the huge shoes of Charlotte Flair.
Baszler is the NXT women's champion and it would have been fitting to add her to the match after winning her match against Kairi Sane a day earlier.
The SmackDown team lacked star power, with Asuka the only big name in the match, while RAW had Sasha Banks and Bayley, who are crowd favourites, while Nia Jax was the biggest name in the match.